Discussion: Women Reproductive system
Discussion: Women Reproductive system
Discussion: Women Reproductive system
Discussion: Women Reproductive system
Discussion: Women Reproductive system
Discussion: Women Reproductive system
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT : Discussion: Women Reproductive system
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Discussion: Women Reproductive system done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Question Description
Advanced Assessment Grading Rubric for SOAP Case Study Documentation
Criteria
Exceeds Criteria 30 pts
Meets Criteria 20-25 pts
Needs Improve 15-20 pts
Unsatisfactory< 14 pts
Subjective 30 pts
CC 5pts HPI 5 pts FMH 5 pts SH 5 pts ROS 10 pts
Data recorded is based on information gathered from health history, medical records, family sources, external records. All recorded data is subjective. All subjective data is collected and is comprehensive.
Data is recorded based on information gathered from health history. All data is subjective. All subjective data collected and is complete The health history/subjective information gathered is consistent to make a working diagnosis
Data recorded is partially based on history. Some data recorded does not indicate source. Did not complete all aspects of subjective data collection. Did complete all aspects of subjective data collection but very superficially, lacking depth.
Medical terminology is not consistently used. There are misspellings in terminology. Subjective and Objective Data is mixed up. The subjective data does not match with the objective data collected. Subjective data is missing based on CC
Objective – 30 pts
Physical Exam to include inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation (20 pts)
Indicated physical exam modalities (5 pts)
Diagnostic lab results and Diagnostic imaging results (5 pts)
Correct medical terminology is used and spelled correctly. All recorded data is objective. Documentation clearly describes in detail all physical findings from physical exam. Documentation is comprehensive, complete and includes all physical modalities.
Correct medical terminology is used. All recorded data is objective. Documentation describes most physical findings. Documentation is complete and includes all physical modalities.
Medical terminology is not consistently used. An occasional subjective data is recorded with objective data. Documentation of physical findings are present but incomplete.
Medical terminology not used consistently. Subjective data and objective data are mixed up.
The documentation does not clearly describe the physical findings. Documentation is missing.
Assessment –10 pts
Diagnosis to include ICD 10 code
Clear justification for working diagnosis. Includes all primary and secondary problems. Ruled in diagnosis. Ruled out differential diagnosis. Listed diagnosis from acute, comprehensive to chronic or benign last. ICD 10 codes included and are specific. 10 pts
Justification for working diagnosis can be determined. Included primary problems. Included some secondary problems. ICD 10 codes included but are unspecified.
7-9 pts
There is incomplete justification for working diagnosis.
The diagnosis is not supported by the subjective and objective data collected. ICD 10 code present
5-6 pts
The working diagnosis is incorrect. Fails to clearly justify primary diagnosis. Fails to note secondary problems/diagnosis.
ICD 10 code is missing
< 4 pts
Plan – 30 pts
Evidence Based Practice Guidelines Treatment (5 pt)
Medications (use of first line medications) (5 pt)
Education (patient and family as indicated)
(5 pt)
Health Promotion/Disease Prevention across the Lifespan (5 pts)
Inter professional Collaboration & Referrals if indicated (5pt)
Follow up (5 pt)
Highly cost effective when ordering diagnostic tests and therapeutic orders. Elicits patient’s perspective. Treatment plans and medications are cost effective and covered by patient’s insurance carrier. Interactions with other Rx, OTC, CAM, and diet are considered. Prescriptions are correctly written including correct medication, correct dose. Treatment recommendations and patient education address all issues raised by diagnosis and are individualized, evidence based interventions. Lifespan considerations included. Anticipatory guidance/health promotion included. Referrals are specific as to who, when, why. Timing and type of follow up is thoughtfully addressed.
Cost effective when ordering diagnostic tests.
Treatment plans and medications are cost effective.
Interactions with other medications and OTC are considered.
Prescriptions are correctly written.
Treatment recommendations and patient education address most issues raised by diagnosis.
Treatment options are evidence based interventions.
Lifespan considerations included. Anticipatory guidance addressed as well as health promotion. Referral included. Follow up is addressed.
Costs are not considered.
Treatment plan may not be covered by patient’s insurance.
Medications may not be covered.
Prescriptions are written partially correct – needing correction to dose.
Minimal patient education
No inter collaboration referrals are considered.
Minor anticipatory guidance.
Follow up is addressed by timing or type of follow up is suboptimal.
Incomplete or inappropriate plan of care.
Treatment plans are effective. May be evidence based or best practice.
Costs are not considered. Therapies and medications may or may not be covered by patients insurance. Prescription is not written correctly. Inappropriate medications ordered. Allergies or other patient variables conflict with medications prescribed.
Minimal patient education or not addressed.
No anticipatory guidance. No lifespan considerations.
Minimal non pharmacological therapy.
No follow up is indicated.
Organization
(Considered for all points)
All information is neat organized in a logical sequence with correct spelling. Bullet format
Information is generally organized in a logical sequence. Used bullets
Minor errors in format. Information is somewhat organized. Used paragraphs
Misspelling present.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order
Place your order now for a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A+